In This Issue
Finalists for the PetQuip Awards 2016 revealed
Why PATS Telford is a ‘must-visit’ event
New recipe added to GA's Grain Free range
Breed-specific dog shampoo set to be launched at PATS
Vet-strength wormers launched by Beaphar
Pet shop boosts trade with birthday cakes for dogs
Nerf Dog Tennis Ball Blaster launches on to UK market
Great business opportunities to expand into grooming
Interpet relaunches market-leading aquarium range
Chuckit! winner donates to deserving dogs at Wood Green
No Bend Pet Bowl trials with major retail group
Get your own copy of Pet Trade Xtra
PDSA launches new pet products range
Jail for armed robber who targeted pet shop
Revealed: The unluckiest pet names in Britain
Lily’s Kitchen appoints new marketing director from Diageo
Retailer to play pet-friendly music instore
Tetra leads innovation in aquatics for 65 years
Benyfit Natural sponsored youngster triumphs in Europe
Henson Franklyn to sponsor 2017 trade fair exhibitor bags
CONTACT US NOW
Find out how Pet Trade Xtra can help to promote your business and products.



Contact neil.pope@tgcmc.co.uk for all editorial matters.

Pictured: Neil's team of helpers, from the top, Oskar, Lucky and new recruit Billie.

Call ben.greenwood@tgcmc.co.uk to discuss advertising and sponsorship opportunities.
Revealed: The unluckiest pet names in Britain
A study by Co-op Insurance has compiled the most unlucky names for pets, according to how much they cost their owners in veterinary bills.

Charlie and Oscar came out as the worst names to choose, with sickly canine Charlies costing their owners £510 in bills for things like stomach upsets, skin complaints and more serious ailments.

As for our feline friends, Oscars cost families £475 after using up their nine lives getting injured in road accidents.

Of course, Charlie and Oscar are probably fairly popular pet names, so that might also have something to do with it.

David Hampson, head of pet insurance at the Co-op says: ‘Any pet can come with its fair share of misfortune, landing you with unexpected trips to the vets or causing mischief around the house.

"However, based on our claims data, Charlie and Oscar certainly aren’t the luckiest names you can give your pet."

For canines, Bella, Max and Ruby were the next most unlucky names – while George, Charlie and Felix cost cat-owners the most.

And if you’re still wondering what to call your next pet, you might want to forget the name Alfie. It was the most dangerous name for both species.
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Email Software by Newsweaver