In This Issue
Sharples 'n' Grant returns to private UK ownership
Armitage flea and tick products recalled after packaging mix-up
How to become an award-winning grooming business
Pet shops could be banned from selling puppies, claim MPs
Animal welfare report raises more questions than answers, says PIF
PetSafe's spoof video is a hit on Facebook
Pet store set to be ‘muesli-free' after successful campaign
Six miracle pets up for national award
1m owners wash pet bedding four times a year or less
AQUA 2017 shaping up to be a fantastic show
Get your own copy of Pet Trade Xtra
TV advert helps to boost sales of Christmas pet products
Stock up now on Animal Instincts Forest Friends Wildlife Plush Toys
Skinner’s set to shake up pet food sector with Premium ‘Life’ range
Two new additions to Beaphar Dental Range
OATA welcomes a new face to its Board of Directors
Aquatic show launches new and improved website
CONTACT US NOW
Find out how Pet Trade Xtra can help to promote your business and products.



Contact neil.pope@tgcmc.co.uk for all editorial matters.

Pictured: There are some advantages of working from home...Neil gets instant hugs from Billie-Jean, the Lancashire Heeler.

Call ben.greenwood@tgcmc.co.uk to discuss advertising and sponsorship opportunities.
Animal welfare report raises more questions than answers, says PIF
 

PET INDUSTRY FEDERATION SAYS EFRA REPORT RAISES MORE QUESTIONS ON ANIMAL WELFARE ISSUES THAN IT SOLVES

The Pet Industry Federation (PIF), the trade association which represents the interests of 2,500 pet businesses, has cautiously welcomed the Environment, Food & Rural Affairs Committee’s Report into animal welfare in England.

The report, published today, outlines a number of recommendations for robust new measures, including a ban on the third party sale of puppies and the suggestion that the RSPCA shouldn’t carry out animal welfare prosecutions.

Whilst PIF welcomes the suggestion for animal welfare prosecutions to go through the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), it would want to ensure that the CPS placed a high priority on such cases so that animal welfare wasn’t compromised.

Nigel Baker, chief executive, said: "Whilst many of the committee’s recommendations are to be applauded, some, in particular the proposal to ban the third party sale of puppies, could lead to unforeseen consequences.

"PIF would have no problem with third party sales of puppies being banned per se, provided that doing so doesn’t result in further welfare concerns arising as a result of a ban.

"However, the reality is that the demand for puppies (estimated at about 800,000 per year) clearly outstrips the supply. PIF is therefore concerned that puppy sales could be forced underground and the opportunity to put regulation and enforcement into these vendors to ensure that the welfare of the animals remains paramount would be removed.

"In the USA, 30% of puppies are now acquired through unlicensed and unregulated rehoming centres as a result of certain states banning third party sales of puppies, and whilst the committee suggests ‘approved rehoming’ centres are a possible source of puppies, it is important to remember that in the UK re-homing centres are also currently unlicensed.  Such a move begs the question - is it right to move puppy sales from a licensed premises to an unlicensed premises?

"As an alternative to banning third party sales, PIF would suggest that the guidelines and the criteria used when licensing the third party sale of puppies is made far more robust, with puppy welfare rather than commercial considerations at their core."

Nigel continued: "PIF is also concerned that the recommendation to ban third party puppy sales has been made without the committee completely understanding the picture of the puppy market in the UK today.

"The report quotes some wildly differing statistics for the size of the puppy market (cited as between 700,000 and 1.7m puppies) and if a ban were to be implemented today, it would only actually affect 80 premises (i.e. those currently licensed to sell puppies; split between 30 retail premises and 50 private dwellings).

"PIF would prefer to see recommendations made on concrete data so that the scale of the issue is fully understood. The risk is that basing a ban on uncertain data might not have the impact that it is intended to have, because sadly large parts of the puppy trade are already likely to be underground."

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Email Newsletter Software by Newsweaver