In This Issue
TV vet challenges PIF on the sale of puppies in pet shops
New video documents Billy+Margot’s trademark case win
Award-winning Animology brand launched in America
Gardman donates £20,000 of dog food to Wood Green
TV vet Joe Inglis says pet food labelling needs to be more transparent
Is this the best April Fool's joke...a dog selfie stick?
Two April Fool's Day stories that turned out to be true
PetSafe adds to popular Busy Buddy range
Pooch & Mutt expands range of foods to include new 10kg bags
Pets at Home launches investigation after dog suffers allergic reaction
Insight Aquarium from Interpet makes fishkeeping easy
Garden centre group raises almost £30,000 for the Guide Dogs
TopLife tie-up with Forest Holidays
Success of Toppl was well worth the wait
Frozzys experiences successful PATS Sandown
Virgin to trial ‘try before you fly’ pets service
CSJ's newsletter packed with information
CONTACT US NOW
Find out how Pet Trade Xtra can help to promote your business and products.



Contact neil.pope@tgcmc.co.uk for all editorial matters

Or becky.kane@tgcmc.co.uk to discuss advertising and sponsorship opportunities.
TV vet Joe Inglis says pet food labelling needs to be more transparent

Pet food manufacturers must be more open about what they're putting in their products, according to TV vet Joe Inglis.

Speaking on BBC Radio 5 live this morning, he responded to concerns raised by University of Nottingham researchers that some pet food labelling does not always accurately relate to the ingredients in the product.

Several pet food brands contain beef, chicken and pork which is not listed on the ingredients, they said.

Mr Inglis, who is well known for his appearances on Vets in Practice, The One Show and This Morning, said: "The problem is transparency. We want to know what we're feeding them (pets). Pet owners need to know what's in there.

"The main ingredient is often not what you would expect."

The researchers found DNA from the three animals in 14 leading brands of dog and cat foods, despite the meats not being mentioned on the products' labels.

Two types of pet food which claimed to contain chicken, actually contained more pig or cow meat, and five samples "with beef" contained more pig DNA.

Kin-Chow Chang, of the University of Nottingham, said: "It may be a surprise to shoppers to discover that prominently described contents such as 'beef' on a tin could, within the guidelines, be a minor ingredient, have no bovine skeletal muscle (meat) and contain a majority of unidentified animal proteins."

Researchers say no regulations have been broken but that pet owners are not getting the products they expect and the current system could cause religious offence.

"Full disclosure of animal contents will allow more informed choices to be made on purchases which are particularly important for pets with food allergies, reduce the risk of product misinterpretation by shoppers, and avoid potential religious concerns," said Mr Chang.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Newsletter Marketing Powered by Newsweaver